We discuss how crowdfunding might influence the future of scientific research in this episode of The Engineering Commons.
Adam is willing to fork over a few dollars to further scientific studies of the universe; how about you?
Crowdfunding is a means for raising money that has recently been garnering a lot of attention. Websites that cover the crowdfunding phenomenon include Crowd Funding Eye and crowdsourcing.org.
The Pebble E-Paper Watch campaign raised more than $10 million on Kickstarter last year.
Basic Research studies the nature of the universe, without seeking any particular commercial benefit. The bulk of basic research in the United States is funded by the federal government and universities.
In contrast, Applied Research attempts to solve practical problems, and is most commonly supported by industrial interests.
Projects the size of the cancelled Superconducting Super Collider are obviously too large to be crowdfunded at this point.
Brian first became aware of scientific crowdfunding via the Weekly Weinersmith podcast.
Medstartr “enables patients, doctors, institutions, partners, and investors to find and fund the best ideas in healthcare and bring them to life.”
Petridish “lets you fund promising research projects and join first hand in new discoveries.”
iAMscientist “is a global community of science, technology and medical researchers who come together to accelerate research, support career development and drive the distribution of discoveries.”
In a recent interview, #SciFund Challenge founder Jai Ranganathan talked about how scientists are adapting to today’s funding environment.
Brian notes an Indiegogo campaign that raised more than $700,000 to send a bus monitor on vacation.
Jeff mentions the Folding@home project that networks together personal computers from all over the world to form a supercomputer capable of simulating protein folding.
A space telescope, with the acronym of ARKYD, is being crowdfunded on Kickstarter with a funding goal of $1 million. In comparison, NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope has already spent more than $3 billion, with the project not yet completed.
The plasma technology video that Jeff mentions is a spoof, making light of how scientists might have to go about getting funding in the future.
The Mantis Shrimp seems to be getting more attention in the scientific community these days.
The decision on how to allocate dollars to marketing is not an easy one for charities, and Jeff thinks that it will be no easier for scientists trying to raise funds from the general public.
The fruit fly has four pairs of chromosomes, and is frequently used in genetics research.
Brian notes that Local Motors is an organization that shares information about vehicle design. They are currently crowdsourcing the design of a motorized bike.
Jeff has a crazy notion about engineering APIs; Carmen and Brian point out that such “tribal knowledge” already exists as app notes and online forums!
Thanks to Rocio Lara for the crowdfunding illustration. Podcast theme music provided by Paul Stevenson
Although he has traveled to several scenic parts of the world, our guest has also had to travel to less aesthetically pleasing venues, such as the Staten Island landfill.
Clay’s least favorite airport is Chicago O’Hare. He thinks the airport in Singapore is definitely the cleanest he has seen.
Engineers traveling for the first time should simply enjoy their opportunity to travel, according to our guest.
Those wishing to learn more about Clay’s travel adventures can browse his “infrequently updated” blog, Engineered4Life.
Thanks to Clay Coons for the photo of him atop the Great Wall of China. Podcast theme music provided by Paul Stevenson
We discuss how engineers use and develop their intuitive senses.
“The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.” — Albert Einstein
We are looking for individuals willing to appear as guests on this podcast, sharing insights and stories from their engineering journeys. If you are so inclined, you can contact us by emailing a message to admin –at– theengineeringcommomons dot com.
Citation: M. H. McCaulley, E. S. Godleski, C. F. Yokomoto, L. Harrisberger and E. D. Sloan, Applications of psychological type in engineering education, Engineering Education, 73, 5, (1983) pp.394–400.
According to McCaulley (1983, not 1990), the majority of engineering students are introverted (I, 56%) rather than extroverted (E, 44%), sensing (S, 53%) rather than intuitive (N, 47%), thinking (T, 74%) rather than feeling (F, 36%), and judging (J, 61%) rather than perceptive (P, 39%).
Showing his advanced age and terminal lack of hipness, Jeff makes a reference to former Tonight Show host Johnny Carson, who left TV in 1992 and passed away nearly a decade ago.
Citation: T. P. O’Brien, L. E. Bernold and D. Akroyd, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Academic Achievement in Engineering Education, Int. J. Engng Ed., Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 311–315, 1998.
According to O’Brien et al. (1998), the only preference from the Myers-Briggs assessment that has a statistical influence on academic grades is that of being an intuitor (N) rather than a sensor (S).
A majority of engineering professors are intuitors (N), while most engineering students are sensors (S). See R. M. Felder and L. K. Silverman, Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education, Engr. Education, 78(7), 674–681 (1988).
Percentage of intuitors by discipline: Physics (63%), Geological (62%), Aerospace (60%), Metallurgical (54%), Mining (40%), Mechanical (39%), Industrial (39%), and Civil (31%). See prior citation: O’Brien et al., 1998.
Jeff references an article titled, How many lightbulbs does it take to change an engineer? It suggests that, when introducing change into an engineering organization, one should give engineers time to assimilate the reasons (for the I), give them a model for change (for the N), provide concrete evidence (for the S), offer a reason for change (for the T), and present a clear process for change (for the J).
The group seems to agree that the best way to learn a subject is to teach it to someone else.